Harriet Harman Finally Breaks Silence on Links to Paedophile Group
HARRIET HARMAN FINALLY BREAKS SILENCE ON LINKS TO PAEDOPHILE GROUP – Labour’s Deputy Leader Harriet Harman has finally spoken to the press regarding her, her husband’s MP Jack Dromey and former Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt’s involvement with the Paedophile Exchange Group (PIE) whilst each held key positions in the National Council for Civil Liberties (NCCL); a government pressure group that openly supported and provided donations to PIE.
You might have thought that Harriet Harman would have given an unequivocal public apology or at least come up with some way of explaining the issue. However, as it so often appears with the immoral behaviour of our politicians Harriet Harman simply stated that this is nothing more than a ‘politically-motivated smear campaign’ and refused to offer any apology over the NCCL’s rather close and disturbing relationship with PIE.
The NCCL is in fact now operated under the name of ‘Liberty’ of which Shami Chakrbarti is currently the director of and who appears at odds with Harriet Harman for Liberty has indeed recently apologised for its links with PIE.
People often ask me why I don’t vote; yes I haven’t voted in the last four General Elections or any Local Elections.
For those who hear such a revelation coming from a person who actively writes about politics it might seem a little at odds; that is what gives me the right to berate a system of Government when I refuse to participate.
Regardless of whether I vote or not, and there’s many people who also abstain, I still have the democratic right to voice my opinion; you might even say I have a unique position for I don’t favour any one particular political party… I won’t say that my views are not bias for anything you say or indeed write carries a personal opinion and therefore it has to be bias to a certain degree.
I refuse to vote because of people like Harriet Harman. I cannot remember the last time I met a politician who had an ounce of moral fortitude, who wasn’t a liar, thief, murderer or in this case a person who appears to support paedophilia… that’s right in all good conscience I am unable to provide an avenue for such people that effectively allows them to govern this nation.
Let’s see what else Harriet Harman had to say…
“They have accused me of being an apologist for child sex abuse, of supporting a vile paedophile organisation, of having a relaxed attitude to paedophilia and of watering down child pornography laws. These are horrific allegations and I strongly deny all of them.”
Now that seems a bit odd because the Daily Mail investigation revealed that Patricia Hewitt described PIE as ‘a campaigning / counselling group for adults attracted to children’
Furthermore NCCL archives clearly show how the pressure group lobbied Parliament for the age of sexual consent to by reduced, to as young as 4 years of age, providing the child gave consent… I’m guessing that on that ideology there’s no reason why a 4 year old couldn’t vote or drive a car… hell why we’re at it why not re-open the work houses and condemn them all to hard labour.
As an added twist of depravity PIE with the support of NCCL also lobbied to make incest legal… it was aptly dubbed ‘Lolita’s charter’ and gave further evidence to PIE’s misguided views on a civilised society.
During the 1970s and 1980s the NCCL, along with PIE, stepped up the pressure claiming that ‘childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in, with an adult, results in no identifiable damage to the child’.
Effectively, PIE with the help of the NCCL attempted to water down child pornography laws and allow adults to openly engage in sexual acts with children without fearing condemnation or imprisonment… is it any wonder why I have no time for the liberals who have all but ruined Britain through their incessant push for political correctness; a system I might add allows murderers, child rapists and terrorists to walk the streets of Britain without persecution or prosecution.
Under an ongoing investigation codenamed Operation Fernbridge, which was launched in response to the Jimmy Savile affair, police are now sifting through documents in order to uncover PIE members involvement in child abuse, of which the police say was widespread on ‘an industrial scale’.
Due to the revelations and in co-operation with Operation Fernbridge the Home Office is also carrying out a ‘thorough, independent investigation’ which might well have Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt suitably concerned.
Labour Party leader Ed Miliband has come out to defend Harriet Harman by saying..
“Harriet Harman is somebody of huge decency and integrity. I know she has a long and proud record of being on the right side of all of these issues.”
Question… If that is the case then why has it taken the Daily Mail ten weeks of asking Harriet Harman to respond? You would think that such would have provoked any decent human being to immediately come out and refute the investigation and explain their position in full.
There are many who feel that the Daily Mail has over-stepped the mark in making an allegation that links Harriet Harman, Jack Dromey and Patricia Hewitt to a paedophile group but when you examine the investigation, that isn’t quite the position.
Today the Daily Mail clearly points out that it makes no such allegation but rather stated the fact that the group she joined in 1978 (NCCL) had in fact lobbied parliament on these issues for some two years earlier.
Harriet Harman is now insisting that the Daily Mail has attempted to make her guilty by ‘way of association’.
She has openly admitted that when she joined the NCCL it had some 6,000 members and approximately 1,000 affiliated organisations of which PIE was but one of them.
Harriet Harman stated…
“I was aware that because NCCL opposed censorship and supported gay rights, paedophiles had sought to exploit that and use NCCL as a vehicle to make their arguments.
But by the time I came to work for NCCL this vile organisation had already been vigorously challenged within the organisation.
The reason I decided to go to work for NCCL was because I actively supported the work they had done and in particular the work of their women’s rights committee on the Equal Pay Act, on the introduction of the Sex Discrimination Act and for greater protection of victims of domestic violence and against race discrimination.”
There is no denying that the NCCL had a close affiliation with PIE and yet Harriet Harman has refused to apologise but instead taken up a defensive position and in doing so provided no clear explanation; if you read into it carefully you can see that she’s attempting to refute allegations where none were actually made.
Considering her failure to offer any form of apology it becomes more clear as to why certain government officials are so keen on the creation of the Royal Press Charter; such effectively would enable them to prevent the press from uncovering and asking questions in cases such as these.
The Daily Mail, in my view, is perfectly correct when it stated… ‘It is a newspaper’s job to ask awkward and controversial questions – questions that in this instance are still awaiting a satisfactory answer.’
Once again I remain firm in my conviction to abstain from voting for I refuse to be part of a system that ultimately puts people in a position of power who then abuse it.
Unfortunately we do not live in an era of democracy for those in Government don’t listen to the voice of the people; in actual fact all we have is the right to vote in the next set of dictators who will lie, steal and engage in all manner of immoral activities for their own political ideologies and ultimate gain.
Harriet Harman and her husband Jack Dromey talk of the Daily Mail’s questions as ‘beneath contempt’ and yet that’s exactly how they have treated public sentiment by staying silent for the last ten weeks.
More on this story … Daily Mail