Is a Smoking Ban a Ban on Your Freedom?

According to Prof. Aeon Skoble, smoking bans are on the rise in America. At first glance, this trend seems to stage a battle of rights. The smoker claims to have the right to smoke, while the non-smoker claims the right to clean air in “public” places such as restaurants and bars.

In an important way, however, restaurants and bars are private places. They have owners, just like homes. Skoble argues that restaurant and bar owners should be able to set smoking rules for their establishments, much like you can set smoking rules in your own household.

Nobody forces a customer into a particular restaurant or bar; drinkers and diners are free to choose among the alternatives available, each of which has a unique environment, including its set of smoking rules. Discussions about “smoker’s rights vs. non-smoker’s rights” miss the fundamental issue: restaurant and bar owners’ property rights.

Have your say… Leave your comments below

You might like:

Smoking Ban in Cars Carrying Children
Tobacco Body Website Gives Incentive to Quit Smoking
EU Crackdown on Smoking
Time to Quit Smoking
Bookmark and Share

Tags assigned to this article:
Freedom of ChoiceSmoking Ban

  • razer

    OK … so it’s against the law for a restaurant owner to discriminate against people based on race, sex or religion. AND … it is required by law to discriminate against people who smoke. If two beliefs are in conflict one of those beliefs must be false. No wonder the West is FUBAR.

    • meebal

      In the UK we have Common Law and the Law of Equity. If Common Law ever comes into direct conflict with Equity then Equity must always prevail… James I

      If you look closely at many of the laws governing what we may or may not do they do in fact conflict with Equity and yet instead of it prevailing it’s now routinely ignored.