UK Crime: Why are Criminals NOT Sent to Prison?

UK Crime: Why are Criminals NOT Sent to Prison?

UK CRIME: WHY ARE CRIMINALS NOT SENT TO PRISON? - The law is a complex labyrinth and one that many people clearly fail to understand.  This is not unexpected considering the volumes of legislation that the UK Court System, and its Judges, has to wade through in order to come up with a decision.

To provide you with an insight into the structure of the UK Court System, I have included the image below:

Graphic representation of the UK and Wales Court System.

The truly unique aspect about our laws is the fact that a sitting Magistrate or Judge is never afforded the luxury of saying; “I don’t know.”  The law, regardless of whether we perceive it to be right or wrong, at the time of judgment, is irrelevant, as the law must provide an answer.

It is the only profession I am aware of where it cannot simply shrug its shoulders and inform people that it has no answer.  This conundrum is the very reason we have Courts and Courts of Appeal and then finally the House of Lords in order to extract a final judgment on any particular case.

It is a growing concern in the United Kingdom that our laws are becoming more and more lax in imposing punishment on those who clearly deserve to be punished; by the way of imprisonment.  So why are our Magistrates and Judges handing down non-custodial sentences, either by providing a Suspended Sentence or a Monetary Fine?

Here I am going to attempt to provide you with my insight into the issue and even suggest a few radical remedies that may, just may, bring back a little law and order and dare I suggest civility on the streets of the UK.

A look at the state of the UK's Criminal Justice System and exploring why UK Judges are unable to imprison the guilty.

Our Prisons - You can look at any statistics you like and all will clearly indicate that our prisons are already over-crowded.  We simply do not have the room to house everyone who commits a crime.

The disturbing issue here is that more and more violent criminals are being handed down suspended sentences due to this issue.  In a recent news article Paul Stratford punched his sons’ school headmistress because she had punished his son for swearing and taunting other students with racial abuse.  The result was a £500 fine and a 9 month Community Service Order.

The question here is; shouldn’t this man be behind bars?  Is this the type of individual we want to walk our streets, especially when he is fully aware that he can attack anyone without any real consequence under law?

The answer is ‘YES’ this person should be serving a custodial sentence, but as I have clearly stated, there simply is very little room available in our prisons and so Magistrates and Judges have to clearly consider the level of risk of putting an individual back on the streets and granting them their liberty.

By now you are probably enraged and no doubt sitting there shaking your head knowing that the UK Court System has almost collapsed and is no longer able to serve the very function it was designed for in the first place – to deliver justice and protect the public.

Human Rights Act 1998 - Many of the UK’s problems lie firmly at the feet of the Human Rights Act.  Magistrates and Judges are no longer able, through this very complex piece of legislation, able to place anyone in a situation that causes them distress or discomfort – that’s the reason why most prisons are little more than hotels and why all amenities are afforded to prisoners.

At this point you are probably thinking; ‘Where is the punishment convicted criminals deserved?’  I am afraid that according to the Human Rights Act, these criminals, under this legislation, are receiving the appropriate punishment; that’s three square meals a day, free heat and light, education, recreation and a nice comfortable bed.

Sitting High Court Judge who's powers of justice are strictly limited by over bearing UK legislation.

UK Is Becoming Over Populated - Many people often see the UK’s problems of criminal activity directly related to the number of legal and illegal immigrants that enter the UK each year.

There are plenty of statistics detailing the correlation between immigrants and crime which clearly indicate that immigrants, both legal and illegal, account for a large proportion of crime in the UK.

Again, we can look directly at the Human Rights Act and previous Labour Governments that simply opened the flood gates and gave them a set of rights that makes them almost untouchable.  Add to this the Laws of Discrimination and you have a recipe for not being able to remove, imprison or punish any person that is of a different ethnic group.

Quite frankly I wouldn’t want to be a sitting Magistrate or Judge in the UK as the job has lost all its meaning of protecting the innocent and punishing the guilty.  How often do you read in the newspaper where a Judge is being admonished for his or her ruling, and how quickly we stand on our soap boxes calling for his / her resignation?

Next time you read an article in your chosen newspaper and you come across an article that berates a Magistrate or Judge for what is clearly a crackpot decision, you may want to ask yourself why.

The answer in my view is simple – we have over the years become an overly liberal society where laws, such as the Human Rights Act, have been passed to protect the liberty of those who clearly do not deserve liberty and should be locked away.


Solving the Problems of UK Justice

The above only scrapes the surface of the issues that each and every Magistrate and sitting Judge faces each and every day when presiding over a case.  In order to provide you with a little compassion for these men and women you might want to consider:

1.  A Magistrate or Judge is the only profession that MUST come up with an answer - It never has the luxury of simply stating there is no law or precedence for a particular case. Each and every case that comes to court must have a conclusion and that conclusion is often contested, which is why we have an appeals system.

2. A Magistrate or Judge has to wade through reams of legislation in order to interpret that legislation as it was intended.  With the increasing number of laws passed each year in the United Kingdom is it little wonder that sometimes a Magistrate’s or Judge’s decision may seem flawed?

I am afraid that before we ‘cast the first stone’ we must realise that all of the issues facing the UK and its judicial system are of our own making.  We have, over the last 30 years, become a very liberal society but this liberalisation, in my view, have been manipulated and abused by our society’s criminals.

The old saying that ‘Crime Doesn’t Pay’ no longer applies and in many cases criminals benefit far more from the system than the innocent who the law is designed to protect.  The question here is do criminals deserve the same liberties as the law abiding citizen?  In my view they do not – once a crime is committed then the individual’s rights to liberty should be forfeited.

Radical Hate Preacher Abu Qatada allowed to stay in the UK because of the Human Rights Act 1998

Radical Hate Preacher Abu Qatada

There have been calls in the United Kingdom to bring back the Death Penalty and maybe it is time that a National Referendum is initiated on the subject.  All countries suffer from levels of crime, regardless of how tough and exacting that punishment may be.

Take Singapore, it is a country with very strict rules of law, where canning and the death penalty are imposed where required under its laws.  Does this make Singapore a barbaric country?

If you have ever had the privilege of visiting Singapore then I can tell you the answer would be NO.  The streets are clean and safe, most citizens respect one another and the criminals are fully aware of the ramifications they face if caught.

Why can we not bring back Corporal and Capital Punishment in the UK?  Surely a child receiving the cane at school is not altogether a bad thing and teaches respect.  As mentioned at the beginning of this article, would that child have sworn at teachers and racially abused other children if he knew that the consequences would have been the cane?

Why can we not bring back the Death Penalty for serious crimes such as murder?  Would we not be better off as a society knowing that murders will no longer be a threat to citizens?

What about the reintroduction of the Birch?  Is it so wrong to flog a person, public or otherwise in order to deliver a clear message that crime will not be tolerated?  Consider the Birch as opposed to imprisonment – it would certainly reduce the prison population and I wonder how many criminals would re-offend knowing what the punishment will be.

Why can we not change the laws that would allow us to deport any undesirables, such as the Radical Preacher Abu Qatada, who not only continues to have his liberty but does so at the massive expense of the hard working, law abiding, UK citizens.

Are we so entrenched in liberal imprisonment that we can no longer call a spade a spade and take positive action to turn the UK into a law abiding, fair and safe society for people to live in?

I know many people reading this may be more than a little shocked that I would even suggest such measure, especially bringing back caning in our schools, but to be quite honest the UK has had its time of liberal intervention by abolishing or changing laws to suit its own end and none of these have produced a safe and just society – far from it, the UK is now a haven for all manner of criminals and the UK is definitely a country where crime DOES pay.

Bookmark and Share

Tags assigned to this article:

  • Pingback: | Joland Giwa AKA Dexter: A Serious Risk to Society

  • Pingback: | Should the Courts Deny Bail?

  • Pingback: | Crime Adviser Says Prison is an Abuse of State Power

  • Pingback: | Anti-Sociable Behaviour an Increasing Concern in Britain

  • Pingback: | UK Crime Figures Growing at Alarming Rate

  • How_delightful

    I would like to see corporal punishment given as an option for the convicted person to choose. I conceptually designed a lashing system thirty years ago which could thrash a subject according to health, sex, weight, age and height. And old geezer on a building site told me it made him honest over fifty years earlier. One of the last Brits to get birched for thieving. He said it worked a treat. I say it was CHEAP on the taxpayer.

    • meebal

      I’m not sure it should be an option. Sentencing someone to the birch should cut crime enormously or at least they won’t come back for more. As you pointed out, correctly, its so much cheaper than locking them up.

      Maybe you should patent your design… might just come in handy in the near future.

      • How_delightful

        One cannot patent an idea one has shared publickly. I may have intellectual property rights; I do have hundreds of inventions, but dont pursue most of them.
        Police sometimes fit people up; so I would not force violence on anyone. Burglars etc should have to choose whether to get *raped?? 1-year in prison or get the birch and a month and save the taxpayer a bundle.

        • meebal

          Well there’s an enlightenment – I’m not that clued up on Patient Law. I have to say I find it fascinating how people invent things – very creative.

          Either way the ‘alleged’ criminal is found guilty of a crime – but yes I do fully appreciate your point and therefore it would probably more constructive to offer an alternative. Personally I think those convicted would more likely take a prison sentence, therefore defeating the object.

          • How_delightful

            Label the burglars and car thieves and purse snatchers as cowards on their pink prison underpants.

          • meebal

            You’re entertaining I’ll give you that. You can’t colour code prisoners; that’s be deemed racist – although an excellent idea.

            Florescent pink and make then march through the streets! Cracking idea.

            Unfortunately a High Court Judge recently ruled that an illegal immigrant cannot be subjected to detention as it’s humiliating and therefore in direct violation of the Human Rights Act 1998 and of course our friends in the EU – the ECHR.

            One of my regulars recently commented that all honest tax payers are mugs as it’s obvious that crime pays; and pays well.

  • Pingback: | Justice Minister Demands Review of Secret Courts

  • Pingback: | Vigilante Killers Who Murdered an Innocent Man Gets Life

  • Pingback: | Kids Anti Social Behaviour in Schools is Out of Control

  • Pingback: | Judge Rules that Terrorist Suspect MUST be Given More Social Liberty

  • Pingback: | Failing Criminal Justice System in the UK

  • Pingback: | Spanking Your Children Should NOT be Wrong

  • Pingback: | Britain: A Violent Society Out of Control

  • mike

    Prisons are a comfortable life with health care, three square meals, heating, and many other comforts available, just being locked away from society is not a bad punishment when you have committed a serious crime. More prisons is not the answer, deportation is a very good idea for non citizens or ones not born and bred in the UK, Juveniles do need some form of punishment that they will remember and deter them from becoming adult criminals. In America, regardless of who they are or standing for minor crimes they have them sweeping streets, cleaning public areas and roads, that is humiliating and a sure deterrent, the punishment saves the tax payer considerable amount by keeping the road verges clean and other areas respectable. It is well past time the human rights act should be abolished or better re-defined as presently it is a disaster waiting to happen, or is it happening right now.

    • meebal

      Yes, since the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998 things have certainly taken a turn for the worst. Did you read about the idea of sending juveniles to Boot Camp?

      Personally I think this is an excellent idea – might be time to bring back the National Service as well. Teaching our kids respect and discipline should not be a violation of their Human Rights.

      I think the idea of offenders sweeping our streets is an excellent idea. Certainly the UK needs a number of positive changes in order to turn around the decay.

      • How_delightful

        Japan uses older unemployed people to sweep the streets and pick plitter. They get a bit more than welfare.

        • meebal

          Sure, and it’s a good idea – if you ask the Japanese they are happy to be productive for the society they live in. It’s a different mindset.

          Just think of all those unemployed people in our prisons that could be put to work.

  • Donna Wozny

    I have mixed feelings on how criminals should be punished since, we are finding new and better ways to use DNA to convict or prove innocence. I do feel however that anyone receiving the death penalty should have the sentence carried out within 3 months. I like the idea of public flogging for misdemeanors and first-time offenders. I couldn’t do it or watch but the humiliation itself should help to be a deterrant to future offenses.
    We consider ourselves too “modern” for strict rules and punishments , being concerned for the rights of the offender and that is now to be our downfall.

    • meebal

      I think that public caning is a great way to reduce crime. Years ago some American 18 year old spray painted a car, while he was drunk, in Singapore. He was given 6 strikes of the can. He was man enough after to say that he shouldn’t of done what he did and the punishment taught him a valuable lesson in respecting other people possessions.

      Guaranteed he’ll never do it again, but at least he was man enough to stand up and say what he did was wrong and that the punishment was fitting.

      Way too much latitude in our Liberal Society.